Gunfire Development 10.03.17 - new thread
Offline
Forum
CS2D General Gunfire Development 10.03.17 - new thread
StirlizZ-Fapicon: Why DC? Can you tell us more information about it? Occasus: I can explain. Skeptic has to hack into CS2D network packed to make multiplayer, because DC wants to keep CS2D closed-source. 
will be funny?? 
Chingy: So Skeptic doesn't want to work on it until DC helps him. Maybe we all could encourage him to continue anyway.At this moment he wants to develop his own 2D shooter for Android with me.
Geez has written@ Occasus: I can explain. Skeptic has to hack into CS2D network packed to make multiplayer, because DC wants to keep CS2D closed-source.
Occasus: I can explain. Skeptic has to hack into CS2D network packed to make multiplayer, because DC wants to keep CS2D closed-source.lol, never heard of wireshark?
hope is not gonna i think dc should help u with this bcuz is ll make cs2d more popular DC: don't want Skeptic to make Cs2d for Androideveryone wants to know the "reason"
Another project that struggeled with the packets was the open source custom cs2d server: https://github.com/FloooD/custom_cs2dsrv
They also had problems discovering what all the packets mean.
It would be helpful for the community if DC would be open about the packet structure, and share it with the community.
Great helpful tools could be developed, like you see in other open source games.
All of the data is verified on the server anyway, so hackers couldn't make use of this information.
I would therefor really like to see some more openness from the side of DC.
DC: doesn't want to share the source code of CS2D is easy: open source = easy to hack = even more brazilian and turk hackers/cheaters Geez has writtenReason why @ DC: doesn't want to share the source code of CS2D is easy: open source = easy to hack = even more brazilian and turk hackers/cheaters
DC: doesn't want to share the source code of CS2D is easy: open source = easy to hack = even more brazilian and turk hackers/cheatersThis makes somehow no sense because they are already too many. So if cs2d sucks and game will be open source the game will suck even harder.
Skeptic: and no one else ll know 
OnlineCheats and hacks and server crashers are already there but telling others the packet structure and the ways things are done would push everything to a completely new -and of course much worse- level. You really don't want to experience this!
I don't get why you guys don't simply write your own net protocol and continue developing the game without compatibility to the original CS2D servers (and if you do it right you can still try to add a CS2D compatible mode later).
The idea to make it compatible with CS2D is very questionable anyway.
The huge point is that people who play on Android would stand absolutely no chance when playing against PC players who actually have a real keyboard and a real mouse. Seriously, controlling a game like CS2D on Android can only be a huge pain in the ass and you can never be as fast and precise as a player who is using real physical input devices. I bet that I would easily beat everyone who plays this on Android (and I really don't play much CS2D).