So there will be a fourth state, called something like
declined - waiting for review
Quality Control
Poll| Yes | 90.48% (38) | |
| Maybe | 4.76% (2) | |
| No | 4.76% (2) |
declined - waiting for review
J192: You should really read what I wrote because you are basically suggesting exactly the same thing 
Talented Doge: User will get file archive ban
Talented Doge: There are multiple straightforward ways to handle such misbehaviors:
temporary file archive ban like
HumayunJ suggested
the file can still be removed completely and instantly
even bigger punishments (full temp ban or full perm ban) are possible for recurring cases
Re: Quality Control
DC:
Re: Quality Control
DC already approved Blazing's newest upload. Nice test subjects,
DC. Inb4 accidentally removes whole file arhieve.
Seekay's and
Starkkz's idea. There should be at least "Reviewer" or "Supporter" rank that can review files accordingly, that really actually look at file's quality.
Dousea: It's there.
CY: You mean only allow selected users to upload stuff? That would be a super harsh and unnecessary restriction. Bad uploads are no reason to limit things in such a brutal way. Also people would bother us all the time to get the permission to upload stuff! And how are we supposed to make a decision there? We need to see the files to decide.
CY,
useigor,
Pseudon and others are very good sprite/skin makers and they can evaluate files properly. Does that mean I'm free to promote them to be reviewers?
File does not exist (16733)